even if there are few components, such as onami-configuration and onami-lifecycle, that add extensions to Guice, they don't integrate with 3rd parties...
not sure, but maybe moving tests that test integrations, would worth be moved in ITs... -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Jordi Gerona <[email protected]> wrote: > You're right, we're testing *integrations* between Guice and other cool > stuff! > > Then, all my doubts are now gone, thanks! > > jordi > > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Simone Tripodi > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi Jordi, >> >> I got what you mean, at the end of the day what we are really testing, >> in junit tests, are _integrations_ between guice and 3rd part >> components. >> >> I'd keep tests anyway where they are, since ITs usually follow a quiet >> different approach of the one adopted - you maybe know much more, do >> you see any side effect at the current situation? >> >> Many thanks in advance, all the best! >> -Simo >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Jordi Gerona <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well yeah, that's what I use to do, but I'm not sure of other ppl >> opinion. >> > >> > Maybe right now it's not worth it 'cos the build doesn't take much time. >> > >> > WDYT? >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Simone Tripodi < >> [email protected]>wrote: >> > >> >> Hola Jordi, >> >> >> >> maybe I didn't get you - are you proposing to move tests under ITs? >> >> >> >> TIA! >> >> -Simo >> >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> >> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ >> >> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi >> >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Jordi Gerona <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > maven-failsafe-plugin and >> >> >>
