btw, sitebricks for which I have just created a pull-request for
validation with bval-guice [1] has a dedicated module for convertion [2].
So it confirms convertion deserves a dedicated module.
Thx, Eric
[1] https://github.com/echarles/sitebricks/tree/validation
[2] https://github.com/dhanji/sitebricks/tree/master/sitebricks-converter
On 02/02/2013 13:27, Eric Charles wrote:
Hi Simo,
Do you mean moving to a toplevel onami module
(org.apache.onami.converters)?
Just asking to be sure, but it makes sense to me as any other module
potentially need convertion.
Thx, Eric
On 02/02/2013 12:13, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
I wonder if it would make sense extracting the converters from
[configuration] in separated modules - my objective is defining all
that modules in a fine granularization in order that users just
include in their application what they really need, and not everything
by default.
So I'd move all converters in a separated branch with sub-module.
Do you have any observation on that?
TIA and have a nice WE,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
