On 02/02/2013 15:31, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Salut Eric!

thanks a lot for giving a try, much more than appreciated! :)

there is just an undocumented feature on the site - users can re-throw
validation exceptions with custom exceptions. But that should be just
a matter of preparing the release, should not concern the migration to
sandbox.

I use that rethrow functionality discovered reading the unit test if I remember well.

Are you talking about an onami release?
Do you plan to migrate from sandbox to trunk? As I said, I don't see why we shouldn't do this directly.

Thx, Eric


Thanks again!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Simo,
As it is a copy with repackaging, the functionality should be kept/

I have checked out
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/sandbox/validation

and successfully mvn install.

pom looks good

Are thinking to any other things to look at?
Otherwise, +1 to push this to trunk

Thx, Eric


On 02/02/2013 15:03, Simone Tripodi wrote:

Salut Eric,

since you mentioned the validation: did you have the time to have a
look at the onami migrated [validation] component? migration should be
quiet complete, but I'd wait for feedbacks after a discussion before
to move it to /trunk.

TIA!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Simone Tripodi <[email protected]>
wrote:

btw, sitebricks for which I have just created a pull-request for
validation
with bval-guice [1] has a dedicated module for convertion [2].


cool stuff, very well done, congrats! :)
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

Reply via email to