my previous samples contain errors, due to rush on replying - sorry :)

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Simone Tripodi
<simonetrip...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Mikhail!
>
> +1 for varargs, result would look charming like a sunshine:
>
>     public AbstractLifeCycleModule( Class<? extends
> Annotation>...annotationTypes )
>     {
>         this( any(), asList( annotationTypes ) );
>     }
>
> Of course I'd change the overloading constructor as well:
>
>     public AbstractLifeCycleModule( Matcher<? super TypeLiteral<?>>
> typeMatcher, Class<? extends Annotation>...annotationTypes )
>     {
>         this( Arrays.asList( annotationTypes ), typeMatcher );
>     }
>
> Clean, compact, clear, direct. We cannot ask more :)
> Feel free to fill an issue and provide a fix.
>
> my 2 cents,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Mikhail Mazursky
> <mikhail.mazur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simone, Jordan.
>>
>> IMHO AbstractLifeCycleModule should check that the List that was passed to
>> it contains no duplicates and throw exception if it does. In any case
>> behaviour in such situation should be described it JavaDocs.
>> Also, is this ListBuilder need to be public API at all? And maybe get rid
>> of it completely by using Arrays.asList()?
>>
>> 2013/3/12 Simone Tripodi <simonetrip...@apache.org>
>>
>>> Hi Jordan,
>>>
>>> >> * the adapted List of annotation should be IMHO a LinkedHashSet,
>>> >> otherwise users could specify the same type twice in the list and
>>> >> drive the lifecycle engine to invoke twice the same method in
>>> >> different phases - IIUC this is not the desired behaviour, or is it?
>>> > It's a List because it needs to be ordered. I hadn't thought about
>>> duplicates.
>>>
>>> the LinkedHashSet[1] will preserve the order like the List does,
>>> moreover will keep the unicity of its elements.
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to