Hey Paul,

+1 from me.

Here's the release process page:

http://s.apache.org/05

Cheers,
Chris

On Jan 10, 2011, at 7:32 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:

> Hey All,
> 
> Was going to send an email saying we should cut a release soon but wasn't 
> thinking this week. That said if there is enough interest I can work to get 
> that done. As I have no clue on what to do on OODT-65 I'm guessing that will 
> take up more of my time than anything else. All that said I'll aim to get an 
> RC out by Sunday. Sound good?
> 
> Chris can you point me in the direction of the release process.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On Jan 9, 2011, at 1:17 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> 
>> Welp, we can't do an out-of-band release unless we VOTE on it. We did 
>> include the python release in the bits what went out for 0.1-incubating, 
>> it's just not installable via easy_install, they have to actually do the 
>> setup.py installation, right?
>> 
>> My recommendation:
>> 
>> We have 40 of 70 issues addressed at this point. I say Paul cuts the 0.2 
>> release candidate this week, we VOTE on it, and as part of the process, Paul 
>> addresses OODT-65 [1]  and makes publishing to PyPI part of the release 
>> process. One question though: 
>> 
>> How do we reference the Python tarball in the PyPI metadata? We can't link 
>> directly to the Apache dist directory, we have to use their mirroring system.
>> 
>> Let me know what you think!
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-65
>> 
>> On Jan 9, 2011, at 11:59 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> 
>>> Argh. Can we do an out-of-band release of our software?
>>> 
>>> The public exposure is making people want the Python release, but sadly all 
>>> we have is a Java release.
>>> 
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>> 
>>>> From: PyPI operators <[email protected]>
>>>> Date: 2011 January 9 1.45.32p CST
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: New rating on oodt
>>>> Reply-To: [email protected], [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> [REPLIES TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT GO TO THE COMMENTER]
>>>> gcb has rated your package as 0/5.  Comment (optional):
>>>> 
>>>> $ sudo easy_install oodt
>>>> install_dir /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/
>>>> Searching for oodt
>>>> Reading http://pypi.python.org/simple/oodt/
>>>> Reading http://agility.jpl.nasa.gov/products/agile-oodt/
>>>> Reading http://oodt.jpl.nasa.gov/dist/agile-oodt/
>>>> No local packages or download links found for oodt
>>>> error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('oodt')
>>>> 
>>>> You can read all comments on http://pypi.python.org/pypi/oodt/0.0.1.
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to