+1 from me...

Cheers,
Chris

On Feb 9, 2011, at 6:56 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:

> Hey Andrew,
> 
> Awesome, it will probably be a few months till the next release but its great 
> to have the volunteer for the next one. There is a release process here 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/OODT/release-process.html but if you forget the link 
> in a few months no need to dig through emails its the first link if you 
> search for "OODT Release Process". Let me know if you have questions. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul
> 
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Andrew Hart wrote:
> 
>> Hey all,
>> 
>> I'd like to volunteer to RM for version 0.3. Thanks Paul and Chris for 
>> setting the example!
>> 
>> -Andrew.
>> 
>> On 2/1/11 8:41 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:
>>> Hey All,
>>> 
>>> Well now that I have the votes finished I'll complete the release today or 
>>> this evening. Thanks for vetting it and onto 0.3, is there a volunteer RM 
>>> for that one? If not, I don't mind doing it again.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Paul
>>> 
>>> On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:39 AM, Sean Kelly wrote:
>>> 
>>>>> I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache OODT 0.2 release. The
>>>>> source code is at:
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~pramirez/apache-oodt-0.2/rc2/
>>>> Code signed and verified: ✓
>>>> MD5 hash: ✓
>>>> SHA1 hash: ✓
>>>> Java tests: PASS!
>>>> Python tests: PASS!
>>>> 
>>>>> [✓] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT<version>
>>>> So long as<version>  is 0.2: YES! +1 all the way! Heck, +1.5!
>>>> 
>>>> --k
>>>> 
>>>> PS: Thanks for engineering this release.
>> 
> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to