Hey Michael,

The archives to the mailing lists are linked here:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/

You will also see the ones that we had for the OODT project as we were in 
incubation.

Hope this helps,
Paul Ramirez

On May 23, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Starch, Michael D (388L) wrote:

> Chris,
> 
> Is there some sort of coding standards document that I should be abiding by, 
> or does oodt just follow standard java "best practices"?  This is the kind of 
> information that seems like it would be easier for me to look up rather than 
> ask on the developer list.  
> 
> Finally, how can I access the archived dev-list mailings?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> On May 19, 2011, at 11:06 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> 
>> Hi Michael,
>> 
>> I'd be happy to reply below, but yes I'd suggest initially CC'ing 
>> [email protected]. Giving this information is great, but I prefer the 
>> community to benefit from these types of discussions (and it means that I or 
>> you or Albert or Cecilia can point others to this question if it is asked 
>> again rather than typing the same answer again or fwd'ing something 
>> private). Also no worries about researching it -- you can ask questions on 
>> that list -- researched or not. We welcome feedback from the community. 
>> 
>> Answers inline below:
>> 
>> On May 19, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Starch, Michael D (388L) wrote:
>> 
>>> Chris,
>>> 
>>> In order to create tables in the new database architecture that Brian 
>>> Foster set up for use, we need the ability to specify some information 
>>> beyond that which is stored in elements.xml.  We wish to store this 
>>> information as part of PCS, rather than continually haggling back and forth 
>>> with our DBA in order to get this set in an ad-hoc manner.
>>> 
>>> The data we need to store is:
>>> 
>>> -Is it a vector type?
>>> -Data-type
>>> -Max data size
>>> and potentially a few more items.
>> 
>> Gotcha.
>> 
>>> 
>>> As it stands now, Brian has used the DCElement tag in elements.xml file in 
>>> order to store some of this information but not all of it.  Thus it seems 
>>> natural that the rest of this information gets stored along side it.
>>> 
>>> There seem to be three ways to accomplish this:
>>> 
>>> 1. Add more information to the DCElement tag, 
>>> 2. Add additional tags to the element file containing this information
>>> 3. Create a sperate file to store this information (Not part of PCS)
>> 
>> I've got a 4th option.
>> 
>> 4. Write a new ValidationLayer implementation, that extends 
>> XMLValidationLayer, but adds your desired information to elements.xml. For 
>> that extra information, I'd favor your proposed option #2 -- I think it's 
>> cleaner.
>> 
>>> 
>>> As head of oodt, we were looking for you input as to which option to 
>>> choose, or if you wish this question to be brought to [email protected], 
>>> where can I research this information before asking the question on that 
>>> list?
>>> 
>>> Below is a brief analysis of each option, from our perspective.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Michael Starch
>>> 
>>> 1. Add more information to the DCElements tag.
>>>     -I believe Brain said this tag was unused, so he "borrowed" it to suit 
>>> this purpose.
>>>     -Adding more information to the tag would "hijack" this tag to a 
>>> further extent.
>>>     -The changes could be made locally to our ColumnBasedDataSourceCatalog 
>>> in the manner Brian already used.
>>>     -If the DCElement is used ouside of the new use Brian invented, this 
>>> change could affect the intended (original) use
>> 
>> I don't like this one (nor do I think others will) since it hijacks 
>> dcElement (which is supposed to be a mapping to a Dublin Core element name, 
>> rather than used for other information).
>> 
>>> 
>>> 2. Add more tags to elements.xml
>>>     -Most elegant solution, as each data field has a tag specified to hold 
>>> exactly it
>>>     -No need to use tags which were originally intended for some other 
>>> purpose
>>>     -It is an architectural change, changing the format of the elements.xml 
>>> file
>>>     -Must be done carefully to prevent us from deviating from apache-oodt 
>>> when it is not necessary to do so.
>> 
>> +1 for this option.
>> 
>>>     
>>> 3. A separate file
>>>     -Creates data/configuration duplication, as some of these fields must 
>>> stay (in some form) in elements.xml
>>>     -Separates similar pieces of data
>>>     -Doesn't alter PCS as it exists now
>> 
>> This is fine too, but I prefer #2.
>> 
>>> 
>>> We favor number 1 or number 2 as it keeps similar data together, and feels 
>>> like it is the most logical place to store this information.
>>> 
>>> I personally favor number 2, as it does not use tags for unintended 
>>> purposes, but I do not wish to make a change that affects our compatibility 
>>> with apache code.  Hence your input.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1 to your preference. I think the way to accomplish it is to write a 
>> YourExtendedValidationLayer extends XMLValidationLayer and that provides a 
>> customized:
>> 1. YourElementClass extends Element 
>>    - provides extra props (getters+setters) that you want to leverage
>> 2. implementations of the SerDe for your specialized elements.xml that 
>> includes those extra tags
>> 3. provides the ability to access this ValidationLayer information and 
>> Element information in ColumnBasedDataSourceCatalog.
>> 
>> BTW, I think it would be great to bake up patches for Apache OODT for what 
>> you are working on, including ColumnBasedDataSourceCatalog (already there 
>> but in a branch, would be nice to forward port to trunk, and your proposed 
>> ValidationLayer and Element extensions). Thoughts? Do you have the time? I 
>> think the community at Apache would sincerely appreciate the effort.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> P.S. Would you be OK with me forwarding this thread to [email protected]? I think 
>> there's some good info here that I'd hate to be lost in the ether...
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> Phone: +1 (818) 354-8810
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
> 

Reply via email to