Hey All,

In a meeting today someone asked me if RADiX was going to include Resource 
Manager, Push Pull, and CAS-PGE. My answer was:

At this point the only things that have been included are Crawler, FileManager, 
and Workflow. Right now we are focused on integrating some of our webapp 
components; namely fmprod, fmbrowser, wmonitor, and curator. After that we will 
bring in Resource Manager, PushPull, and CAS-PGE (likely in that order). I 
would say though that you have identified the outliers at the moment and that 
in a final RADiX distribution those components should be included. If get more 
people on board we can test this stuff out and integrate stuff at a faster 
clip. Hopefully, this raises some interest and minimally we get some people 
jumping on board. I'd really like to get some scripts getting put into place 
that work at the system level. In addition, I'm looking forward to the point 
where the RADiX distribution could have some high level commands to do common 
tasks. 

For instance:

prompt> oodt-radix -createProductType foo-spec.xml

Where foo-spec.xml contained possibly a summary of the new product type to be 
created, extractors to be used, workflows to kick off on ingestion, and so on. 
This command could then update all the underlying configuration files against a 
RADiX install

or:

prompt> oodt-radix -productTypeInfo foo

This command could then give a summary of all information concerning product 
type "foo" across the components

That stuff is probably a ways out there but it would be nice to make some 
strides to get there. For the OODT 0.4 Release the target is to get in 
FileManager, Workflow, and Crawler. If we make it any further it will be at the 
help of other volunteer(s), which may be incoming very soon.

Thanks,
Paul



On Oct 3, 2011, at 2:09 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> Over the past few months Cameron and I have tried to make the RADiX vision a 
> reality. Here's a brief update on the work and a preliminary of what will be 
> shown at ApacheCon 2011 
> http://www.slideshare.net/PaulRamirez9/apache-oodt-radix. In addition, there 
> is a Wiki that we have been using to collaborate on 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/RADiX+Powered+By+OODT; this 
> is a great place to start to understand RADiX and will likely be the basis 
> for installation documentation. As always volunteers are more than welcome. 
> Feel free to use this list to provide feedback to stuff on the Wiki.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul & Cameron
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Ramirez, Paul M (388J)" 
> <paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov>>
> Date: April 18, 2011 8:14:16 AM PDT
> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>" 
> <dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>>
> Cc: oodt-dev <oodt-...@jpl.nasa.gov<mailto:oodt-...@jpl.nasa.gov>>
> Subject: RADiX for ApacheCon
> 
> Hey All,
> 
> Cameron and I are going to send in a proposal to talk about RADiX at Apache 
> Con in November. RADiX aims to be an easy distribution of OODT with 
> components integrated out of the box. It will provide a direction for both 
> the source and deployment structure of OODT and allow one to easily get from 
> one to the other. Feel free to help out or provide input to this effort at 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/RADiX+Powered+By+OODT . We 
> have an initial goal of getting Crawler, FileMgr, and Workflow integrated by 
> end of June and the rest of the components by end of October. As always 
> comments, suggestions, and commits are welcome.
> 
> As a side note, our Apache Con presentation will focus mostly on RADiX but it 
> would be nice to have a presentation that focused on OODT vocabulary and its 
> paradigm to building data systems; which would flow really well into our 
> presentation.
> 
> Any others that want to help out in this Apache Con effort the submission 
> deadline is Friday, April 29th http://na11.apachecon.com/. We're hoping that 
> we can build synergy with anyone else that is going to submit a presentation 
> proposal.
> 
> Thanks,
> Paul Ramirez & Cameron Goodale
> 

Reply via email to