No problem!

Cheers,
Chris

On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:14 PM, Verma, Rishi (388J) wrote:

> Hey Chris,
> 
> I tried 0.3, and it worked just fine (generated workflow met passed down to 
> other tasks when using resmgr batchstubs). Thanks for the suggestion!
> 
> rishi
> 
> On Oct 26, 2011, at 6:44 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> 
>> Hi Rishi,
>> 
>> Thanks. Yep that's the problem below (and why Jenkins has been screaming at 
>> me for weeks). I broke the build 
>> a few weeks ago when I committed portions of OODT-310. I want to wrap up 
>> OODT-310 and need to get to it, 
>> but in the meanwhile, if you can use a revision prior to those commits (or 
>> better yet, a revision right around 
>> when I wrapped up OODT-70), or even 0.3, that will get you on the right 
>> track for now.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Chris
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 26, 2011, at 3:17 PM, Verma, Rishi (388J) wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Chris,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the code snippet.
>>> 
>>> I'm running my XmlRpcBatchStub on the same host as my workflow manager, so 
>>> I don't think that is the issue.
>>> 
>>> I looked at my XmlRpcBatchStub log however, and found the following 
>>> exception being issued whenever one of my tasks was sent to this batch stub:
>>> org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcException: java.lang.Exception: 
>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.SequentialProcessor cannot be cast to 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.engine.ThreadPoolWorkflowEngine$ThreadedProcessor
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClientResponseProcessor.decodeException(XmlRpcClientResponseProcessor.java:104)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClientResponseProcessor.decodeResponse(XmlRpcClientResponseProcessor.java:71)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClientWorker.execute(XmlRpcClientWorker.java:73)
>>>     at org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:194)
>>>     at org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:185)
>>>     at org.apache.xmlrpc.XmlRpcClient.execute(XmlRpcClient.java:178)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.system.XmlRpcWorkflowManagerClient.updateMetadataForWorkflow(XmlRpcWorkflowManagerClient.java:424)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.structs.TaskJob.updateMetadata(TaskJob.java:137)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.structs.TaskJob.execute(TaskJob.java:113)
>>>     at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.resource.system.extern.XmlRpcBatchStub$RunnableJob.run(XmlRpcBatchStub.java:229)
>>>     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
>>> 
>>> I'm using workflow-manager 0.4-SNAPSHOT (not the latest trunk). Off the 
>>> bat, does anything look strange to you? It seems from the exception, that 
>>> the workflow met is definitely not being properly passed to the batch stub.
>>> 
>>> I know a lot of updates have been made to WM lately, so I tried to build 
>>> the latest trunk version of 0.4-SNAPSHOT; however, it currently fails the 
>>> 'TestXmlRpcWorkflowManagerClient' test with:
>>> java.text.ParseException: An exception occurred because the input date/time 
>>> string was not at least 24 characters in length.
>>>      at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.commons.util.DateConvert.isoParse(DateConvert.java:165)
>>>      at 
>>> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.structs.WorkflowInstance.setCurrentTaskStartDateTimeIsoStr(WorkflowInstance.java:339)
>>> 
>>> I'm going to look more into it and investigate, but maybe I will try 
>>> deploying with 0.3 OODT and see if the problem persists.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> rishi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 9:07 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hi Rishi,
>>>> 
>>>> The metadata context should be persisted, based on updates made during the 
>>>> tasks themselves. If you have a look at 
>>>> TaskJob [1], you'll see the last step in the execute(JobInput in) method 
>>>> is:
>>>> 
>>>> {code}
>>>>  // now we have to update the workflow manager with the metadata
>>>>     // that may have been updated
>>>>     updateMetadata(taskInput.getDynMetadata());
>>>> {code}
>>>> 
>>>> which should call back to the parent workflow manager and update the 
>>>> workflow instance
>>>> with the current metadata. If you're not seeing this it's possible that 
>>>> your XmlRpcBatchStub 
>>>> on your executing node cannot see back to the parent WM running on 
>>>> host:port.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this the case?
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Chris
>>>> 
>>>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Verma, Rishi (388J) wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm trying to pass generated metadata from a workflow task to another 
>>>>> workflow task (both in the same workflow) when using a resource manager 
>>>>> to execute workflow task jobs. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I've done this before successfully when workflow tasks within a given 
>>>>> workflow are run locally (by the workflow manager itself) but when I 
>>>>> point workflow manager to have tasks execute through a resource manager, 
>>>>> my generated metadata does not seem to transfer from one task to the next.
>>>>> 
>>>>> By "generated" metadata, I mean metadata that is added within the "run" 
>>>>> method of an implemented WorkflowTaskInstance. It's worth noting though, 
>>>>> that metadata passed into the initial XmlRpc call of a workflow task 
>>>>> seems to be passed to all subsequent tasks just fine. Just not generated 
>>>>> metadata - which passes only when not using a resource manager.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm trying to ascertain if this issue is a bug or not. To find out, could 
>>>>> someone elaborate a bit on which resmgr (or other) classes would include 
>>>>> code that actually shows metadata for a job being passed through a 
>>>>> remotely running job? I've been trying to find such code within the 
>>>>> codebase but have not come across it yet.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> rishi
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: [email protected]
>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to