On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 4:53 PM, B W <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi BW, >> >> On Jan 14, 2012, at 1:15 PM, B W wrote: >> >> > "Ability to easily adapt a system’s software architecture is an >> > important property missing in OODT.." Chris Mattann; Dissertation. >> > >> > I think this statement was in the context of the degree and manner >> > (dynamism) to which the messaging layer components were decoupled in >> GLIDE >> > in comparison with OODT. >> > >> > Has there been architectural re-factoring to address this? >> >> Actually nope, it's still missing but something that we typically >> mitigate through >> careful design and deployment strategies with the system. Overall it >> would be nice >> to have GLIDE-like properties integrated into the OODT core, but that >> hasn't been >> done yet. >> >> Uug..Ok. > Where in the current design is the tight coupling? > * Synchronous versus asynchronous event based? > Can you talk to the the strategies for mitigation? > > Thx. BW > >> HTH, >> Chris >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Senior Computer Scientist >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 >> Email: [email protected] >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >
