The CAS component a metadata registry, but, this is for Metadata to Product registry right?
What we are talking about in this thread regarding the registry would be useful for say: caching queries and respect product index(s) that matched some metadata, synonymous with the common data dictionary, in a custom data dictionary for an external data repository. Right? On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) < [email protected]> wrote: > Hey Sean, > > Super +1, sounds awesome and looking forward to it. > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Jan 13, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Hardman, Sean H (388J) wrote: > > > Hey Chris et al, > > > > My plan is to submit the Registry Service as another component under the > > OODT umbrella. This process will probably not start until late summer or > > early fall of this year due to the PDS delivery schedule. I want to make > > sure that we have satisfied all of the PDS requirements for the software > > before we turn it over to the open source world. For those interested in > a > > little more information regarding the software, albeit a tad PDS-centric, > > we presented a poster [1] at the AGU Fall meeting last year (last month). > > > > Sean (The Other Sean) Hardman > > > > [1] > > > http://eposters.agu.org/abstracts/a-model-driven-science-data-product-regis > > tration-service > > > > > > On 1/12/12 8:22 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hey Sean, > >> > >>> > >>> The ebXML model is one of the least egregious for a registry that I've > >>> seen, and believe me, I've seen some nasty ones. But what makes JPL's > >>> implementation so compelling is its JSON-esque and ReST-ful based API, > >>> which, as far as I can tell, is totally original within the ebXML & > >>> OASIS worlds. > >>> > >>> Normally I turn my nose up to heavy-handed models with entrenched APIs, > >>> but the singular achievement of JPL is to make the ebXML model, which > >>> conceptually isn't byzantine, actually usable, approachable, and > >>> extendable. > >> > >> Super +1. > >> > >>> > >>> Is there any hope we can get JPL, Caltech, and NASA to give it up to > >>> become part of OODT? Or its own Incubator project? > >> > >> I think Hardman is working on it, he can feel free to comment (or not) > >> here ^_^ > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > Senior Computer Scientist > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > Email: [email protected] > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >
