Hi BW,

On Jan 24, 2012, at 6:32 PM, BW wrote:

> Where is the centralized repository? CAS?

It depends: CAS can act as a centralized repository, 
or can expose distributed repositories, it really depends
on the specific architectural configuration.

Cheers,
Chris

> 
> BW
> 
> On Jan 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Bruce Barkstrom <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> If you're working Earth sciences, there are at least four
>> different dialects for the terms:
>> 1.  Global Change Master Directory
>> 2.  ESDIS and derivatives
>> 3.  ISO 19115-2 and other, related geospatial metadata standards
>> 4.  CF Profile of Unidata (probably the most even handed of the lot
>> - albeit with a fair influence from the general circulation modeling
>> community - and therefore somewhat deficient with respect to various
>> observations)
>> 
>> There are serious divergences in the vocabularies (GCMD and
>> CF Profile have some parameter names with each dialect having
>> about 1,000 terms and only about five to ten exact matches
>> when all the terms are cast into upper case.  The JPSS terms
>> for the upcoming operational system may have more than 100,000
>> individual items, but their vocabulary probably doesn't match up
>> exactly with the World Meteorological Organization's terms, etc.
>> 
>> In short, there's exactly the mishmash one might expect from trying
>> to find the "common language" of isolated Amazonian tribes who
>> suddenly encounter each other on the streets of Rio.
>> 
>> Best of luck trying to get to some commonality in describing either
>> data formats or time-space sampling patterns.
>> 
>> Bruce B.
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Crichton, Daniel J (4231) wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Building a solid data architecture requires someone with extensive
>>>> experience.  The planetary science data architecture, for example, is an
>>>> international effort with many sub-disciplines.  Capturing data compliant
>>>> to that data architecture requires defining a solid, consensus-based model
>>>> and that takes time and it is a community effort. Other efforts aren't as
>>>> rigorous, so I think it depends on the application and use of OODT.  In
>>>> some cases, it may be a simple model.
>>> 
>>> +1, agreed.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Chris
>>> 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>>> Senior Computer Scientist
>>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [email protected]
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to