-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#review7482
-----------------------------------------------------------


like the patch!... few comments


./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16558>

    Why do you want Holding category to be returned?



./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16556>

    This should return a copy of runnableProcessors here... probably where your 
synchronization issue is



./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16554>

    getRunnableProcessors() is never null... probably should be a unit-test to 
insure that functionality



./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16555>

    !querier.getRunnableProcessors().isEmpty()



./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16565>

    When Success/done is passed in, the processor created is incorrect since it 
has a sub-processor in Queued/waiting



./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/#comment16560>

    Should probably add a NOT done processor here


- brian


On 2012-05-02 05:08:45, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-05-02 05:08:45)
> 
> 
> Review request for oodt, brian Foster, Ricky Nguyen, Paul Ramirez, Sheryl 
> John, and Thomas Bennett.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Task Querier thread for OODT-310. See javadocs on: 
> https://builds.apache.org/job/oodt-trunk/javadoc/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.html
> 
> 
> This addresses bug OODT-310.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-310
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TaskQuerier.java
>  1332505 
>   
> ./trunk/workflow/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/WorkflowProcessor.java
>  1331866 
>   
> ./trunk/workflow/src/test/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/engine/TestTaskQuerier.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4961/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Includes unit test, that currently isn't passing. I think I know why 
> (something up with my threading logic and synchronized keywords) but wanted 
> to throw it up for review. I'll likely be working on this tomorrow or the 
> following evening.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chris
> 
>

Reply via email to