Once I've addressed the non trivial lucene update ill move in to this as I
am interested in it.
Thanks for reply.

On Sunday, March 24, 2013, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Lewis,
>
> Since I still have not officially received this email from dev@oodt,
> (grr) and since I saw it on the mail archives, I'm going to copy your
> email below, with the same subject, and hope it gets threaded right :)
>
> Comments below:
>
>
> On 3/20/13 5:55 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney (lewi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>>All,
>>
>>I picked up OODT today and immediately thought about an implementation of
>>Apache Gora [0] for abstracting persistence within the CAS metadata
>>catalogue.
>
> +1, I've wanted this for a while. A GoraCatalog implementation of the FM
> Catalog
> Interface.
>
>>Right now, for me, the persistence of my metadata catalogue to Lucene or
>>MySQL is sufficient and I have no immediate justification for using some
>>alternative storage mechanism however I noticed that there are a few areas
>>where OODT could generally benefit from the Gora implementation.
>>It is natural that product discovery via daemon driven CAS crawler (for
>>example) will fire product streams of varying nature towards the catalogue
>>storage mechanism. Lucene or MySQL my not be best best option to store
>>such
>>streams of data and/or the best way to later retrieve that data. Gora
>>would
>>enable a much more comprehensive variety of data stores to be available
>>for
>>persistence of catalogue metadata and would also provide a much more
>>flexible model specifically geared towards better solutions for metadata
>>cataloguing. Currently we support Amazon DynamoDB, Accumulo, Cassandra,
>>HBase, HDFS, HSQLDB and MySQL. We have patches for Solr, MongoDB and
>>various file based stores. There is also interest to implement an Oracle
>>NoSQL DB.... don't ask.
>
> Haha!
>
>>I notice that the SolrIndexer tool implemented by Paul provides an
>>expressive number of options for indexing to your Solr HTTP server. The
>>gora-solr module would provide all these plus more.
>>I suppose this entirely depends on the requirements for expanding metadata
>>catalogues within the File Manager.
>>Is it envisaged that such an implementation is required for some use cases
>>or would be required?
>
> Yes, please, help! :)
>
>>As Gora builds on Hadoop principles, I suppose it would also enable folks
>>use their metadata catalogues in different, possibly useful, use-case
>>adaptable ways.
>>Just an initial thought.
>
> A great one at that, I would be super +1 for a GoraCatalog to help in
these
> situations and would be keen to work on it with you.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>>Thanks
>>Lewis
>>
>>
>>[0] http://gora.apache.org <http://gora.apache.org/>
>>--
>>*Lewis*
>>
>>
>
>
>
>

-- 
*Lewis*

Reply via email to