I would be fine with it either way. I usually just filter the commit related messages anyway if I'm on an especially verbose list. OODT is quiet enough that I don't really mind them being the same.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 7:42 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Progress on OODT is strongly driven by JIRA issues, so my only concern > would be that folks might forget to subscribe and miss out on what > initiates progress on the codebase. > > --k > > On 2013.Apr.30, at 5.04a, Gavin McDonald <[email protected]> wrote: > > > A personal peeve of mine, all the jira notifications going to the commits > > list, makes it hard to see whats going on. > > > > (Yes I could filter but..) > > > > How about an issues@ list where we can send the jira stuff ? > > > > Gav... > > > > > >
