Glad to hear it! ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message----- From: Zichuan Wang <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, November 9, 2014 at 7:14 PM To: Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Problem with OODT Workflow RSUBMIT >Dear Professor, > > >Just shut down resource manager and process task only using workflow >manager, and the speed boosts. > >— >Zichuan Wang >Department of Computer Science, USC > > >On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Christian Alan Mattmann ><[email protected]> wrote: > > >If it¹s talking to the resource manager my guess is it¹s >either (a) not pushing through there b/c of the queue size; >and or (b) the capacity on the batch stub. > >Try upping the batch stub capacity in resmgr/policy/nodes.xml. >Maybe make it equal to the max # of jobs you want it running >at a time? > >Cheers, >Chris > >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >University of Southern California >Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >Email: [email protected] >WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Zichuan Wang <[email protected]> >Date: Sunday, November 9, 2014 at 7:02 AM >To: Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Problem with OODT Workflow RSUBMIT > >> >> >> >> >>Here is a screenshot of OODT monitor. My wild guess is workflow is >>running sequentially, instead of parallelly. Really got no idea what I >>could do to make it faster... >> >>‹ >>Zichuan Wang >>Department of Computer Science, USC >> >> >>On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 5:06 AM, Zichuan Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>Dear Professor, >> >> >>I followed your advise on enlarge workflow manager¹s min pool size, and >>now jobs no longer hang in queues, instead, they are marked as >>³RSUBMIT². >>Could you please give me another advise on how to speed workflow manager >>in this case? >> >>‹ >>Zichuan Wang >>Department of Computer Science, USC >> >> >> >> > > > > > >
