Do we want to cut an 0.8.1 that includes this fix?

Tell you what. I’ll RM it and get an RC Out hopefully
in the next 2 days.

------------------------
Chris Mattmann
[email protected]




-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 3:12 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: OODT-757 issue remains in RADiX OODT 0.8

>This is annoying.
>It is good to hear that it is fixed in trunk though.
>Thanks Tom for working to address these niggling issues.
>For a quick note, I updated the release process so that this issue i
>included It is pretty minor to address it in the release management
>process
>so I think it is OK to keep it there for the time being.
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>Thnaks folks
>Lewis
>
>On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 5:34 AM, Tom Barber <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi Val
>>
>> I have to apologise I thought I'd fixed it, but I must have pushed the
>> commit after I branched and built 0.8.
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/trunk/mvn/archetypes/
>> radix/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pge/pom.xml
>>
>> In trunk I removed the hard coded 0.3 and so it should now work but in
>>the
>> tag:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tags/0.8/mvn/
>> archetypes/radix/src/main/resources/archetype-resources/pge/pom.xml
>>
>> You'll see its still hardcoded to 0.3.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On 19/01/15 21:13, Mallder, Valerie wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,  Hope everyone had a good holiday. I can't believe we are 3
>>>weeks
>>> into January already.
>>>
>>> I want to give everyone a heads up that if you are using the RADiX
>>> version of OODT 0.8, there are two problems that I ran into in OODT 0.7
>>> that are still causing me some issues in OODT-0.8 and tell you how to
>>>work
>>> around them.
>>>
>>> OODT-757 documented a issue where the PGETaskInstance could not launch
>>>an
>>> AutoDetectProductCrawler due to a coding typo.  The typo has been
>>>fixed in
>>> 0.8, but if you are using the RADiX install of  OODT 0.8, there is an
>>> additional problem where the cas-pge-0.8.jar is not actually installed
>>>in
>>> the pge/lib directory. Instead, cas-pge-0.3.jar is installed in the
>>>pge/lib
>>> directory and therefore, you do not get to take advantage of the fix
>>>for
>>> OODTD-757.
>>>
>>> The fact that cas-pge-0.3.jar is installed in the pge/lib directory is
>>>a
>>> known issue related to OODT-761 that I found in OODT-0.7 (and looks
>>>like is
>>> planned to be fixed in OODT-0.9) where cas-filemgr-0.X.jar file is not
>>> installed in resmgr/lib and workflow/lib directories,
>>>cas-workflow-0.3.jar
>>> (rather than cas-workflow-0.8.jar) is installed in resmgr/lib, and
>>> cas-pge-0.3.jar (rather than cas-pge-0.8.jar) is installed in pge/lib,
>>> workflow/lib, and resmgr/lib directories.
>>>
>>> So, in order to use the RADiX easy install, you actually have to
>>>download
>>> these libraries from the full version of OODT 0.8, build them, and
>>>install
>>> them in the lib directories in your RADiX installation.
>>>
>>> I heard there is a problem in the later versions of the pge component
>>>and
>>> that is the reason why the RADiX install remains at version 0.3.
>>> Unfortunately, this creates a problem for anyone who needs to use fixes
>>> that went into the later versions of the cas pge component.  Does
>>>anyone
>>> know the status of the problem that is preventing the RADiX install
>>>from
>>> installing cas-pge-0.8.jar?
>>>
>>> In the meantime, I continue to do the steps mentioned above.
>>>
>>> Val
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Valerie A. Mallder
>>>
>>> New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer
>>> The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory
>>> 11100 Johns Hopkins Rd (MS 23-282), Laurel, MD 20723
>>> 240-228-7846 (Office) 410-504-2233 (Blackberry)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> *Tom Barber* | Technical Director
>>
>> meteorite bi
>> *T:* +44 20 8133 3730
>> *W:* www.meteorite.bi | *Skype:* meteorite.consulting
>> *A:* Surrey Technology Centre, Surrey Research Park, Guildford, GU2
>>7YG, UK
>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>*Lewis*


Reply via email to