To phrase the question a little differently, how do you upgrade OODT in a
project? Do you need to download the new source/Radix distribution and copy
over configuration files? Or, could we make it more modular?

Tyler

On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Val,
>
> My general practice is to maintain config files along with each
> RADIX deployment now, but in the past, I was known to maintain a
> thin, minimal OODT project in Github and/or SVN and then to have
> like an Maven/Ant integration script that runs RADIX, (or formerly
> before it existed did a bunch of SVN/Git checkouts and builds) and
> then overlays my config on top. You can see a similar example of
> how to run things from Ant/Maven here:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oodt/tools/depfixer/
>
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: [email protected]
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <Mallder>, Valerie <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: how do you manage OODT files vs. project-specific files?
>
> >Hi All,
> >
> >I am looking for some advice, so please respond if you have ideas on this
> >topic.
> >
> >Assuming you are using OODT, or developing OODT, to support a totally
> >different project that you are working on in your day job, how do you
> >manage all of your OODT files vs. all of your project-specific files?  I
> >am looking for real-life examples of how people are configuration
> >managing their files.
> >
> >I am using the deployed RADiX Archetype, which suggests that I keep my
> >project specific files in an 'oodt/extensions' directory.  However, I
> >have also made changes to some OODT configuration and policy files such
> >as workflow/policy/tasks.xml and workflow/policy/events.xml, etc.
> >
> >If I wanted to upgrade to a new version of the RADiX Archetype and deploy
> >a new release of the RADiX Archetype over top of my current version, then
> >all of my changes to the tasks.xml and events.xml files would be lost.
> >
> >What is your favorite way of managing your OODT installations so that
> >changes you have made to the configuration  files and policy files
> >located in each OODT application's directory tree are not overwritten?
> >(Ideally, I wish I could keep all of my project-specific and changed
> >files outside of the each OODT application directory tree, but it doesn't
> >sound like anyone does this.)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Val
> >
> >P.S. I have managed large software systems before, but they were
> >different from OODT in that
> >
> >
> >
> >Valerie A. Mallder
> >
> >New Horizons Deputy Mission System Engineer
> >The Johns Hopkins University/Applied Physics Laboratory
> >11100 Johns Hopkins Rd (MS 23-282), Laurel, MD 20723
> >240-228-7846 (Office) 410-504-2233 (Blackberry)
> >
>
>

Reply via email to