No clue, but the CAS curator allows metadata update through its REST services. I would be building on top of those (and yes we need to uncouple the JAX-RS of those services, along with the services that Ross Laidlaw wrote that allow for querying, etc.)
Turns out much of the stuff Tom Barber and you want Starch to build the new whiz-bang UI is already there in the REST layer - they are just coupled to the web apps and components in some cases they support - note Paul Ramirez filed issues before to uncouple them scope them out in JIRA. Cheers, Chris ------------------------ Chris Mattmann [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Michael Starch <[email protected]> Reply-To: <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 10:55 AM To: <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Schema Evolution within OODT CAS >There were proposals for a OODT Metadata update tool, which would fix this >problem. Anyone know what happened to this work? >On Apr 22, 2015 7:52 AM, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" ><[email protected]> >wrote: > >> I get it... I've never used that backend however. >> For every Catalog extending the base Catalog interface it is >>implementation >> specific. >> Lucene catalog is Ok, Solr is not Etc >> >> On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Michael Starch <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Lewis, >> > >> > In my experience, if the underlying catalog allows schema evolution, >>so >> > does OODT. >> > >> > Using the DataSourceCatalog meant our DBA could apply a schema update >>to >> > the database which was a form of schema evolution. >> > >> > Does this answer your question? >> > >> > Michael >> > On Apr 22, 2015 7:40 AM, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < >> > [email protected] <javascript:;>> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > hi Folks, >> > > Very simple question... Is there any built in support for schema >> > evolution >> > > in OODT CAS? >> > > Say I have product MD and the fundamental structure of the MD >>changes >> > (over >> > > and above arbitrary changes in MD values) do I need to re catalog >>all >> of >> > my >> > > products? >> > > Right now I think the answer is yes but would be pleasantly >>surprised >> to >> > > hear otherwise. >> > > Thanks >> > > Lewis >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *Lewis* >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> *Lewis* >>
