Hi Eva Thanks for the feedback.
Can you just expand a little upon your scenario? I'm happy to include whatever people think would be useful in the proposal. Tom On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Eva Schlauch <eschla...@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de> wrote: > Hi Tom and all, > > I am looking forward to the book, it will be a great help for people like > me :-) > > Since I don't know the examples: will there be one that explains an > implementation that gets used by different people (different products) and > gives back a new product like a summary on a web page and provides > extensions for statistics on the new products? (is that a scenario > interesting for more people than only me?) > > Best regards, Eva > > > Am 26.05.15 um 11:52 schrieb Tom Barber: > > Alright chaps this is pretty last minute as I have to chat to the guy from >> Manning tomorrow so if anyone has 5 minutes, can you scan: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dGVf0j25WzXZCyTyuX9aMmmQ06yAPLOFtuTFZe-0aXk/edit?usp=sharing >> and add anything you think is missing. The link is open to all so you >> should be able to add/change entries, just italicise them or something so >> I >> can spot them. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >> wrote: >> >> Thanks for the feedback guys. >>> >>> The chat I had with the chap was certainly around a full book as I have >>> to >>> pitch 9 - 14 chapters. He did say they are trying to move away from >>> generic >>> platform books so I think pitching it in the style of a look at all the >>> main components and heavy on the real world how-to and use cases would be >>> the way I'm tending to go along with a load of stuff on the value of >>> metadata etc. >>> >>> We discussed use case ideas and I went over some of the crazy NASA stuff >>> which he said I should include and also a bunch of real world use >>> cases(smart meters/regulatory compliance application and stuff from my >>> day >>> job), but of course, you lot don't live in the real world so you'll have >>> to >>> leave that to me ;) >>> >>> On 1.0 I'm sure it will come out during the time we would spend writing a >>> book. >>> >>> I'll come back with a draft toc tonight or tomorrow and those interested >>> can add their 10 cents. >>> >>> Tom >>> On 20 May 2015 18:26, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Spoke to Tom White a while ago @ApacheCon about this very topic folks >>>> with >>>> one interesting outcome. >>>> Many publishers (I don't know about Manning, however Chris will likely >>>> know) are interested in Microbooks or picket guides as well. >>>> An example is the following >>>> http://shop.oreilly.com/product/9780596007430.do >>>> I don't know if this fits for something like OODT but you guys can >>>> consider. >>>> Lewis >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Chris Mattmann < >>>> chris.mattm...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Thanks Mike. I don’t think 1.0 is required >>>>> *before* writing the book, but can happen >>>>> while the book is going on (and be pushed in >>>>> many cases by the book!) :) >>>>> >>>>> We had the same scenario with Tika in Action. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------ >>>>> Chris Mattmann >>>>> chris.mattm...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Michael Starch <starc...@umich.edu> >>>>> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> >>>>> Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 10:10 AM >>>>> To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> >>>>> Subject: Re: OODT book proposal >>>>> >>>>> I am definitely up for this. Are we going to push for an OODT-1.0 >>>>>> "polished" released before we write a book? There seem to be a lot of >>>>>> very >>>>>> nice features in the pipe, which will affect the content of a book. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regardless, I believe the following may be helpful for the book. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Setting Up OODT >>>>>> - Major OODT Components >>>>>> - Extending OODT >>>>>> - OODT in Operations >>>>>> >>>>>> -Michael >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Freeborn, Dana J (398G) < >>>>>> dana.j.freeb...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is great. I would be happy to contribute to the book if my >>>>>>> >>>>>> level >>>> >>>>> of >>>>>>> experience with OODT (which is high) is helpful. It's not clear to >>>>>>> >>>>>> me >>>> >>>>> your >>>>>>> focus for the book, so you'll just have to tap me if I can >>>>>>> >>>>>> contribute. >>>> >>>>> Paul and Chris will know if I do. Otherwise, I will cheer on your >>>>>>> efforts. :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Dana >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Tom Barber >>>>>>> <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi<mailto:tom.bar...@meteorite.bi>> >>>>>>> Reply-To: "dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>" < >>>>>>> dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>> >>>>>>> Date: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:02 AM >>>>>>> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>" >>>>>>> <dev@oodt.apache.org >>>>>>> <mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>> >>>>>>> Subject: OODT book proposal >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi guys, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was on the phone to Manning today about an OODT book that me, Chris >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> Mike Starch mulled over in Texas. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've been tasked with coming up with a TOC as the proposal so I'll >>>>>>> >>>>>> knock >>>> >>>>> something together and share it later in the week, but on this topic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> a) Does anyone have anything they'd especially like to see in an OODT >>>>>>> book? >>>>>>> b) Does anyone want to help donate some hours writing a bit of the >>>>>>> >>>>>> book >>>> >>>>> (won't be any time soon and takes months so don't worry about it, >>>>>>> >>>>>> and I >>>> >>>>> wont hold you to it, just looking for interest) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tom >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Lewis* >>>> >>>> > -- > Eva Schlauch > MPI f. Radioastronomie > Auf dem Huegel 69 > D-53121 Bonn > Phone - 0228 525 254 > eschla...@mpifr.de > >
