Hi Chris,
thanks for replying it… yes that would be a great improvement.
I’ll look into what would be needed to implement it - I’ll do it unless it’s
awfully complicated….
thanks, Luca
On Jun 9, 2015, at 9:49 AM, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Not supported in the current XMLRepositoryManager, Luca,
> but would be a GREAT improvement to add a property like
> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.repositorymgr.xml.recursePolicy
> and if true, it will take each
> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.repositorymgr.dirs
> value (after splitting on comma), and then treat the given list
> (could be just one) as a folder which is expected to have sub-folders
> which in turn have the 3 XML policy files in it. For example, a
> sample filemgr.properties for this would look like:
>
> # new feature
> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.repositorymgr.xml.recursePolicy=true
>
> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.repositorymgr.dirs=file:[OODT_HOME]/cas-filemgr
> /policy
>
>
> Which in turn would load:
>
> core
> trace
> geo
>
> And each of the above sub directories would have the 3 policy
> files. This sound like a good improvement?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: "Cinquini, Luca (398G)" <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 8:07 AM
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Subject: question on FM/WM configuration
>
>> Hello all,
>> I have a quick question about configuring the File Manager and Workflow
>> Manager to support multiple projects…
>>
>> Clearly, you can list all policy/ directories in the two files
>> etc/filemgr.properties and etc/workflow.properties, for example:
>>
>> org.apache.oodt.cas.filemgr.repositorymgr.dirs=file://[OODT_HOME]/cas-file
>> mgr/policy/core,file://[LABCAS_HOME]/biomarker-discovery/policy,….
>>
>> But this becomes unwieldy if you have lots of projects, or if you need to
>> create the configuration dynamically. Is there any alternative to
>> explicit listing ? For example,
>> recursion into subdirectories doesn’t seem to be supported, correct ?
>>
>> thanks, Luca
>
>
