Github user buggtb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/23#discussion_r35351331
--- Diff: crawler/pom.xml ---
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ the License.
<artifactId>cas-crawler</artifactId>
<name>Catalog and Archive Crawling Framework</name>
<description>The Catalog and Archive Service Crawling
Framework.</description>
+ <packaging>bundle</packaging>
--- End diff --
Makes me sad I spent hours copying and pasting!
But your plan also doesn't fit my idea because bundling all of oodt into a
mega bundle is a bloat that isn't required. For example I just want to
deploy a file manager and expose it via DOSGI to a main server, why would I
deploy a massive jar for a very light weight requirement.
I started by creating a wrapper jar for it but I figured as we're only
changing a very default manifest file actually pushing it down to the Base
jars made more sense.
On 23 Jul 2015 18:48, "Chris Mattmann" <notificati...@github.com> wrote:
> In crawler/pom.xml
> <https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/23#discussion_r35350102>:
>
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ the License.
> > <artifactId>cas-crawler</artifactId>
> > <name>Catalog and Archive Crawling Framework</name>
> > <description>The Catalog and Archive Service Crawling
Framework.</description>
> > + <packaging>bundle</packaging>
>
> maybe we shouldn't change the default packaging per project, but instead
> create an oodt-bundle that is packaged as an OSGI bundle that combines the
> constituent sub projects.
>
> â
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/23/files#r35350102>.
>
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
