Yes, they are interfaced up. No it’s not a simple pick and choose everywhere since the parts for selecting the underlying transport are sometimes configurable, and other times hard coded last I looked.
Also I think we can effectively split and simply not interface this and leave 1.x and 0.x as the XML-RPC lines, and eventually deprecate XML-RPC in 2.x (Avro) and just move to an Avro only thing. Maintaining both and having the communication layer interfaced up is a nightmare. My 2c. Cheers, Chris — Chris Mattmann chris.mattm...@gmail.com -----Original Message----- From: Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 8:34 AM To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org> Subject: Re: Avro RPC stuff >Booo! > >Aren't they just interfaced up and you pick either XMLRPC or Avro? > > > >On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Chris Mattmann <chris.mattm...@gmail.com> >wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> IMO this is a post 1.0 Apache OODT release. >> I’d like to do a full triage of e.g., the OODT-491 >> stuff, get as much of that committed as possible; >> also the typing stuff for File Manager, and a couple >> other bells and whistles. >> >> This will fundamentally change and is backwards non-compat >> if we move to Avro. For example an 0.x and/or 1.x OODT >> client or server won’t be able to talk to a 2.x OODT Avro >> client/server. >> >> Also this needs to be tested e.g, in an ImageCat, DRAT, >> and/or mission scenario to make sure it fully works as >> expected before a merge into master. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> >> — >> Chris Mattmann >> chris.mattm...@gmail.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> >> Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> >> Date: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 8:25 AM >> To: "dev@oodt.apache.org" <dev@oodt.apache.org> >> Subject: Re: Avro RPC stuff >> >> >The Pom.xml rearranging screwed me a few weeks back. >> >I've got a patch locally to sort this ot and will commit then drag the >> >avro >> >RPC branch up to date with trunk. >> >What we need to do is properly scope out what needs to be done to >>finish >> >this task off. >> >Radu, >> >Are you able to write here what you think is required to finish the >>task >> >off please? >> >Thanks >> > >> >On Wednesday, November 4, 2015, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >> >wrote: >> > >> >> Hey Lewis/Radu >> >> >> >> Where are we on this? Anything I can do to help drag it into the >>land of >> >> the living? >> >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> > >> > >> >-- >> >*Lewis* >> >> >>
