Thanks no worries. I just need 1 more +1 and I can release tomorrow…
On 7/21/17, 1:15 PM, "BW" <w...@apache.org> wrote:
Hi Chris. Haven't yet; deferred I guess. Sorry, on vacay..
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 1:11 PM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi BW, have you tried RC #2? +1 still?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 7/19/17, 5:32 PM, "BW" <w...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:51 AM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Absolutely, here is a simple use case:
> >
> > If you look at CAS-PGE files, they typically include setup to “stage
> files”
> > (already archived in File Manager) to the local job working
> directly. Many
> > times
> > this is just handled in the bash script (or Python or whatever) that
> > CAS-PGE generates
> > itself. However it’s such a repetitive task and *part of* the actual
> > workflow for running
> > a job, we added a simple interface to do so. See here:
> >
> >
> >
>
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/oodt/master/pge/src/test/resources/pge-config.xml
> >
> > And notice this block:
> >
> > <fileStaging dir="[StagingDir]" force="[ForceStaging]">
> > <stageFiles metadataKey="InputFiles" />
> > </fileStaging>
> >
> > What the above does is inspect the value of the InputFiles metadata
> as
> > provided
> > to CAS-PGE (even if it’s a list) and for each of those files, it
> “stages”
> > them (aka uses
> > the associated and declared DataTransferer for this CAS-PGE
> instance) to
> > the directory
> > defined by [StagingDir].
> >
> > Cool huh?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> > P.S. It doesn’t work now, but will shortly ;)
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/17, 8:43 AM, "Mallder, Valerie" <valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Yes, adding a note to CHANGES.txt is fine. The fix to the
> fileStaging
> > feature of CAS-PGE sounds good, although I've never understood what
> that
> > feature is supposed to do :) When you have some free time I would
> love to
> > hear about what you are using it for.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 11:37 AM
> > To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.1 RC #1
> >
> > Thank you Val!
> >
> > I may spin another RC not only because of the below (which I
> think we
> > should just note in CHANGES.txt (I am happy to add a note on it),
> but also
> > b/c I found an interesting bug while testing OODT 1.1 RC #1 with
> DRAT – the
> > bug relates to using fileStaging – it doesn’t explicitly set a
> > Product.PRODUCT_STRUCTURE* and as so gets an NPE if you try and use
> it. I
> > never encountered this before b/c I never used OODT’s native file
> staging
> > support in CAS-PGE. It is a simple fix, and I think will add a lot
> of value
> > (fileStaging is inoperable without it in CAS-PGE).
> >
> > Due to that, I will spin another RC shortly.
> >
> > Thank you!
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/19/17, 7:55 AM, "Mallder, Valerie" <
> valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I downloaded the source and built it with "mvn package
> -skipTests"
> > and it built ok. I did a system test by running some data through my
> > pipeline that uses cas-workflow-1.1, cas-filemgr-1.1 and cas-pge-1.1
> and
> > everything worked as I expected. And it even helped find some
> things that
> > I needed to tweak in my test environment :)
> >
> > The only problem I should note is that had to delete the
> workflow
> > repository directory and allow cas-workflow-1.1 to create a
> repository from
> > scratch. cas-workflow-1.1 reported an incompatibility with workflow
> > repository that was created with cas-workflow-0.10 and has been used
> with
> > cas-workflow-1.0 for a while now. (Also note that, if the repository
> > directory exists but it is empty, workflow manager will crash. So, I
> had to
> > delete the repository directory itself rather than just delete the
> contents
> > within it.)
> >
> > The error I received is below. It looks like the change
from
> > lucene-core-2.0.0.jar to the lucene-core-6.1.0.jar caused this
> > incompatibility between cas-workflow-1.0 and cas-workflow-1.1.
> Deleting my
> > pipeline's workflow respository and allowing cas-workflow-1.1 to
> create a
> > new one was not a problem for me, but I can't speak for everyone.
> >
> > Jul 19, 2017 10:45:02 AM
> >
> org.apache.oodt.cas.workflow.instrepo.LuceneWorkflowInstanceRepository
> > addWorkflowInstanceToCatalog
> > WARNING: Unable to index workflow instance:
> > [d8dad567-6c90-11e7-9e4e-7574e3a12106]: Message: Format version is
> not
> > supported (resource
> >
>
BufferedChecksumIndexInput(MMapIndexInput(path="/project/oodt/dev/jedi/data/workflow/slothrop/segments"))):
> > -1 (needs to be between 1071082519 and 1071082519). This version of
> Lucene
> > only supports indexes created with release 5.0 and later.
> > java.lang.NullPointerException
> >
> > Val
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:mattm...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 6:54 PM
> > To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.1 RC #1
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT
1.1
> > release. The source code is at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
> >
> > For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt
> file
> > for details on release contents and latest changes. The release was
> made
> > using the OODT release process, documented on the Wiki here:
> >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
> >
> > The release was made from the OODT 1.1 tag at:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.1
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available at:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1012/
> >
> > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.1.
> The
> > vote is open for at least the next 72 hours.
> >
> > Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome
> to
> > check the release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval.
> The
> > vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.1
> >
> > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Chris Mattmann
> >
> > P.S. Here is my +1.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
