Build looks good Tests pass (except its usual hated of the BST timezone) Artifacts look good, notice and license in place.
I shall say +1 on the assumption that I'm a tool. Thanks for cobbling it together Chris. Tom On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Mallder, Valerie < valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu> wrote: > +1 > > > Sent with BlackBerry Work > (www.blackberry.com) > > From: Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org<mailto:mattm...@apache.org>> > Date: Wednesday, Jul 19, 2017, 3:01 PM > To: dev@oodt.apache.org <dev@oodt.apache.org<mailto:dev@oodt.apache.org>> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache OODT 1.1 Release Candidate #2 > > Hi Folks, > > I have posted a 2nd release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.1 release. The > source code is at: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ > > For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for > details on > release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT > release process, documented on the Wiki here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process > > The release was made from the OODT 1.1 tag at: > > https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.1/ > > A staged Maven repository is available at: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1013/ > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.1. The vote is > open for at least the next 72 hours. > > Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the > release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote passes > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.1 > > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... > > Thanks! > > Chris Mattmann > > P.S. Here is my +1. > > > >
