[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16587713#comment-16587713
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on OODT-990:
-------------------------------------

lewismc opened a new pull request #71: OODT-990 Enable OODT to build under JDK 
10.X
URL: https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/71
 
 
   PR addresses https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-990.
   The more I dug here, the more unmanageable this patch became/is becoming so 
what is represented here is a cleanup patch (complying with Type safety, 
removing unused imports, etc.) as well as addressing use of deprecated API's 
peppered throughout the OODT codebase.
   
   I should mention that when I run the tests from the parent pom, 
[TestXmlRpcWorkflowManager.java](https://github.com/apache/oodt/blob/master/workflow/src/test/java/org/apache/oodt/cas/workflow/system/TestXmlRpcWorkflowManager.java)
 hangs. I would like others to let me know if it hangs when they test this 
patch.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


> Enable OODT to build under JDK 10.X
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OODT-990
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-990
>             Project: OODT
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: build proces
>            Reporter: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Assignee: Lewis John McGibbney
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 1.9
>
>
> When reviewing the 1.2.4 RC, I decided to build under JDK 10.X. This issue 
> will document and contain a fix for any deprecation and code improvements 
> required to build and test master branch under JDK 10.X.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to