Hi Tom and Imesha, A quick follow up question: as we are soon going to have the dockerfile PR finalized, I believe what’s next is the deployment configuration for it. Is integrating the distributed configuration management in the scope for this project, or should we focus on creating the docker-compose/kubernetes service configurations as standalone (using the predefined configurations) for now? IMHO, if we get the standalone configuration completed and documented, then implementing the distributed configuration would be an extension of it, right? Or is it a completely goal effort to achieve?
Best Regards, Yasith Jayawardana ------------------------------------------------ Yasith Jayawardana PhD Student | Old Dominion University phone: +1 757 698 8978 On Jul 26, 2019, at 2:20 AM, Jayawardana, Yasith <yas...@cs.odu.edu<mailto:yas...@cs.odu.edu>> wrote: Hi All, This is a quick update regarding the current status of the OODT Docker Deployment project, and what’s next. During the last two meetings with @Imesha, we decided to use docker named volumes to mount the /data directory, which contains the catalog and archive content. The other directories will use the default structure enforced by the RADiX build. However, if the user needs, they can mount directories on top of the existing ones to specify new policies, etc. But this will be outside the default dockerfiles and handled at Docker Compose level. Also, I will be working on the comments made by @Imesha on the PR and fix things along the way. I am also working on a new Documentation that discusses about the docker build process, and add it to the Confluence wiki in the upcoming weeks. Also I’ll be working on quick start guide using the docker build process, which will not be as extensive as the documentation, but serves as a barebones guide to get a user up and running. Best Regards, Yasith Jayawardana ------------------------------------------------ Yasith Jayawardana PhD Student | Old Dominion University phone: +1 757 698 8978 On Jul 24, 2019, at 12:50 AM, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org<mailto:ime...@apache.org><mailto:ime...@apache.org>> wrote: Hi Yasith, Thanks for the PRs. I have added some comments to them. Could you check? On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 at 13:31, Jayawardana, Yasith <yas...@cs.odu.edu<mailto:yas...@cs.odu.edu><mailto:yas...@cs.odu.edu>> wrote: Hi all, I created two PRs based on the discussion with @Imesha and @Tom over the last weeks. The two PRs are as follows: * https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Foodt%2Fpull%2F100&data=02%7C01%7Cyasith%40cs.odu.edu%7Cec02797c980d42b08a1108d7119160b2%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C636997188429111104&sdata=KnFaAMuAoaqiYPJRObje%2FOT6aLrbmm4s14YWZ2nWt74%3D&reserved=0 - This contains the Dockerfiles and modifications to existing files to accommodate docker image creation workflow in radix. I moved this workflow into a separate build profile named “docker” so that it won’t break existing workflows. * https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Foodt%2Fpull%2F99&data=02%7C01%7Cyasith%40cs.odu.edu%7Cec02797c980d42b08a1108d7119160b2%7C48bf86e811a24b8a8cb368d8be2227f3%7C0%7C0%7C636997188429111104&sdata=CCfyTy9%2B6uD3NjAVztK8a8sA%2FgbQMr53ML4WKe%2BSLcQ%3D&reserved=0 - Updated maven-assembly-plugin references in the radix archetype from 2.2-beta to 2.6. This was due to encountering errors when extracting the tar on certain distros (for my case it was alpine linux) After updating the plugin version the error was resolved, so thought it was worth a PR. As it was suggested, both PRs are aimed at “development” branch and not the “master” branch. Appreciate if you all could take a look and review it, and any suggestions are welcome! Best Regards, Yasith Jayawardana ------------------------------------------------ Yasith Jayawardana PhD Student | Old Dominion University phone: +1 757 698 8978 On Jul 4, 2019, at 2:20 PM, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org<mailto:ime...@apache.org><mailto:ime...@apache.org><mailto: ime...@apache.org<mailto:ime...@apache.org><mailto:ime...@apache.org>>> wrote: Hi Yasith, Thanks for the update! No worries about recent quietness. Let's focus on getting file manager container to interact with solr as the next step and look at what volumes require to be mounted. Once that is done, we can see how we can accommodate your code within OODT. Thanks, Imesha
