Hi all, 2. About JDK 11 support, does anybody have any idea on how we can test that > or what issues do we have when running with JDK 11? I remember Lewis trying > to run OODT with JDK 10 sometime back [3] [4] >
As we discussed offline, here I'll put my suggestion regarding OpenJDK 11 migration. When migrating basically what we have to have to do is - Update all dependencies to the latest versions. - Compile the project and resolve all issues related to unofficial access, split packages and deprecated/removed Java EE modules. We use the official Oracle JDK 11 migration guide[1] as a head start. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to update all the dependencies without breaking stuff. Have to try and see! [1] https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/11/migrate/migration-guide.pdf Thanks and Regards, Gimhana On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 13:32, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> wrote: > Great! We have 2 action items then: > > 1. Making Avro RPC the default. We once did this for the 1.9 release and > later reverted due to 1.x backward compatibility issues [1]. Therefore, > this task can reuse some commits we had there (simply revert [2]). > > 2. About JDK 11 support, does anybody have any idea on how we can test that > or what issues do we have when running with JDK 11? I remember Lewis trying > to run OODT with JDK 10 sometime back [3] [4] > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-1031 > [2] https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/116 > [3] https://github.com/apache/oodt/pull/71 > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-990 > > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 22:20, Tom Barber <t...@spicule.co.uk> wrote: > > > I've officially marked all my email as read, so thats 3000 emails gone > > forever... on the plus side, I should have some time now. I've got a > couple > > of projects I need to get off my plate so I shall setup my new laptop > next > > week and sort them out, then I'll get this code base stood back up and > > figure out the best place to start. > > > > Tom > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 4:22 PM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 from me Imesha! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> > > > Reply-To: <dev@oodt.apache.org> > > > Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 at 7:49 AM > > > To: dev <dev@oodt.apache.org> > > > Subject: Re: OODT 2.0 planning > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > > > This is my suggestion, what if we include both Avro default support and > > JDK > > > > > > 11 support for OODT 2.0 as JDK 11 support seems to be critical as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Imesha > > > > > > > > > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon > > > > > > > > > > Virus-free. > > > > > > www.avast.com > > > > > > < > > > > > > https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link > > > > > > > > > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 14:42, Imesha Sudasingha <ime...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > > > > > Regarding docker images, we haven't decided where to push them yet. > > Yasith > > > > > > was the person who contributed to them for his GSoC. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Yasith, > > > > > > > > > > > > Your help is much appreciated and we will definitely need your help > > there. > > > > > > Keep in touch with the mails in this list. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Imesha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 22:55, Jayawardana, Yasith <yas...@cs.odu.edu> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I can make some time to help with the 2.3 release as well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > > Yasith > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Nov 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Sean Kelly <ke...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2.0 – first release where we remove all the Xml-RPC and we change > > > > > > nothing > > > > > > >> else. Avro is the default, and only > > > > > > >> comm option – though interface exists for anyone that wants to roll > > > > > > their > > > > > > >> own. We change nothing else* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds fine by me. XML-RPC was "fun while it lasted". > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2.1 – first release with newer JDK support (everyone is asking for > > > > > > this, > > > > > > >> and it screws up people like me with > > > > > > >> new Macs, or computers and newer JDKs by default). We also begin > > > > > > cleaning > > > > > > >> up dependencies and removing > > > > > > >> old ones, and pointing at new stuff. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh my glob yes, yes, yes! > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2.2 – OpsUi React with GSoC 2019 output. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't comment on 2.2 since I've never used it. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> 2.3 – We integrate, test and demo the Docker builds. We also test > and > > > > > > fully > > > > > > >> bake the ZK deployments and > > > > > > >> scaled up Docker. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are these the images owned by "oodthub" on hub.docker.com? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take care, > > > > > > > -SK > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Spicule Limited is registered in England & Wales. Company Number: > > 09954122. Registered office: First Floor, Telecom House, 125-135 Preston > > Road, Brighton, England, BN1 6AF. VAT No. 251478891. > > > > > > > > > > All engagements > > are subject to Spicule Terms and Conditions of Business. This email and > > its > > contents are intended solely for the individual to whom it is addressed > > and > > may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise > > protected from disclosure, distributing or copying. Any views or opinions > > presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not > > necessarily represent those of Spicule Limited. The company accepts no > > liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. > If > > you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by > > reply email before deleting it from your system. Service of legal notice > > cannot be effected on Spicule Limited by email. > > > * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>* * <http://www.linkedin.com/in/nadeeshangimhana/>*
