Hi, I am impressed with the ideas that have been put forward. Please take a look at these documents that were based on the 2000 edition of the PM-BOK.
http://oopm.openoffice.org/files/documents/177/1844/OOPM_Requirements_Di scussion_Draft_A1a.sxw http://oopm.openoffice.org/files/documents/177/1755/oopm_use_case_discus sion.sxd (links work fine from Windows) Any ideas about how to break up the functionality into iterations? Who (would not need to be one person - it could be broken down) wants to try and take the description(s) of how the application should work? Gil, how do you want the Team to deal with change management / version control? Chuck Hunt AVP, Project Manager WFS - RCAS Program Office (Phone) 612-667-9652 (Cell) 612-910-9651 (Fax) 612-667-0097 (MAC) N9301-01R [EMAIL PROTECTED] >This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on this message or any information herein. If you have received this message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation. > -----Original Message----- From: Gil Hauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 8:31 AM To: dev@oopm.openoffice.org Subject: Re: [oopm-dev] Regarding Chuck Hunts request for features useful to project managers On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 07:22, Richard Powell wrote: > Scope change tracking / management. This could be used to show how > scope changes affected resourcing, timeframes, and costs. It would be nice to have a powerful 'what if' scenario engine. Perhaps assigning names to specific scenarios and then being able to a scenario to scenario comparison of some aspects of the project (e.g., cost, time, etc.) > > Automated costing based on resources used. eg $50 per hour for Mike, > $30 per hour for Bob and $200 per hour for earthmoving equipment. > > Budget tracking (e.g. planned expense vs. actual, contingency margins > etc) > > Consider import/export of other project software file formats for > professional project managers. Absolutely! At the very least to MPX format, or directly to Microsoft Project through COM (on Windows). > > Sharing resources between projects - this is quite challenging to > implement I believe, requiring projects to be stored in a common > database. You are right in labeling this as challenging but I think this is a 'must have' if the tool is going to be a production grade device. > > Identifying inter-project dependencies. Also would be nice to have indicators in a project that highlight where dependencies have changed the parameters of the current project. Gil --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
