Hi Gil, Am Freitag, den 01.12.2006, 11:52 -0500 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Hi all, > > First, just a quick correction ... Charles was VERY involved in helping > define and drive the project. > > I believe where the last flurry of activity ended was a resolution to > proceed in two directions: > > 1) define requirements for the tool and help shape the vision > 2) while requirements are being defined, prototype some 'proof of > concept' ideas that can be reused once the requirements are solidified > enough. > > At the time, we didn't have enough developers on the list so perhaps > it's time to take another poll and see what we have in hand? > Sounds we are on the same wavelength ;-)
> I'd love to see this project proceed at some measured pace, however we > need involvement from lots of people -- users who would like to see > functionality in the tool and developers who know OOo well enough to > realize the vision of the users. > > Claus did a lot of work in starting the requirements discussions by > creating 'issue' entries for each requirement in order to capture > discussions. Can someone take those issues and summarize them in some > sort of requirements document? > > Gil Yes, setting up the issues so that everyone could contribute his ideas was a great idea. Let's first review them (until Dec-17?) and then make this document? Dietmar --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
