No implications that I know other than not SVN anymore, we would just work out of the GIT repo. Patches to reviewboard will work out of the box (instead having to patch SVN and diff again before uploading to reviewboard).
At work we use exclusively GIT and we never run into an issue where we said 'wish we had SVN' Thx On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alejandro, > If we move to GIT what are the possible implications. I know GIT is very good > in various cases. Is there any down-side? > Will there be any SVN clone repo? > > Regards, > Mohammad > > ________________________________ > From: Harsh J <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 7:24 PM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Any objection in requesting moving from SVN to GIT ? > > +1 > On Sep 13, 2012 3:40 AM, "Mayank Bansal" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> + 1 for git >> >> Thanks, >> Mayank >> >> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Ryota Egashira <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > +1 from me. >> > >> > Ryota >> > >> > On 9/12/12 10:30 AM, "Alejandro Abdelnur" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >Please let me know, if I don't hear any objection by Monday morning >> > >I'll file the corresponding INFRA ticket. >> > > >> > >Thx >> > > >> > >-- >> > >Alejandro >> > >> > >> -- Alejandro
