[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13459732#comment-13459732
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-994:
-------------------------------------
I guess there isn't an "easy" way to distinguish them. There is a "transient"
counter and the number of retries that both get incremented when this happens
that shouldn't be incremented when the 'suspend' command is used, but I'm not
sure if these are exposed to the user on the web UI or CLI.
> ActionCheckXCommand does not handle failures properly
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-994
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-994
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: workflow
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: trunk
>
> Attachments: OOZIE-994.patch
>
>
> If the JT restarts or dies and running jobs are lost or the JT is not
> reachable, Oozie ActionCheckXCommand will never fail the workflow job.
> There seem to be 2 issues here:
> * convertException is not receiving the root cause exception anytmore, but
> alway HadoopAccessorException wrapping the root cause exception. We should
> modify the convertException to inspect the cause exception as well.
> * ActionCheckXCommand does not do the handle retry logic of
> ActionStartXCommand.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
