> On Oct. 26, 2012, 9:30 p.m., Mona Chitnis wrote:
> > Fair enough. The downstream class which acts upon the message and updates 
> > the missing dependency map will have the concrete implementation of 
> > onMessage() then.

yes


- Mohammad


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7741/#review12848
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 25, 2012, 8:16 p.m., Mohammad Islam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7741/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 25, 2012, 8:16 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This task includes:
> 1. Provide two methods to register and unregister a message ;listener with 
> generic message handler for a specific topic.
> 2. Use the 'default' end point , when no endpoint is passed.
> 3. A new generic message handler interface that anyone can implement and pass 
> for message handling.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug OOZIE-1033.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1033
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/jms/MessageHandler.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/jms/MessageReceiver.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/trunk/core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/jms/TestMessageReceiver.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7741/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mohammad Islam
> 
>

Reply via email to