> On Dec. 28, 2012, 12:56 a.m., Virag Kothari wrote:
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/branches/hcat-intre/utils/dbutils/updatescripts/dbscripts-3.2.0.sql,
> >  line 421
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/8770/diff/2/?file=243698#file243698line421>
> >
> >     as we dont have create index scripts for other columns, we should skip 
> > having this here and in dbscripts-4.0.0.sql. 
> >     its better to have it only for upgrade scripts.

Shouldn't the indexes also be part of the full db script? I was surprised that 
other indexes were not there. If there are more indexes, we should add them to 
the full script instead of removing them


- Rohini


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8770/#review14948
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 28, 2012, 12:42 a.m., Rohini Palaniswamy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8770/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 28, 2012, 12:42 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Have marked the changes done from 3.1.0 script as comments.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/branches/hcat-intre/utils/dbutils/updatescripts/dbscripts-3.2.0.sql
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/branches/hcat-intre/utils/dbutils/updatescripts/dbscripts-4.0.0.sql
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/branches/hcat-intre/utils/dbutils/updatescripts/updatescripts-3.1.0-to-3.2.0.sql
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/oozie/branches/hcat-intre/utils/dbutils/updatescripts/updatescripts-3.2.0-to-4.0.0.sql
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8770/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> tested the create and alter statements on a oracle db.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rohini Palaniswamy
> 
>

Reply via email to