I suggest we wait till Hadoop 2.1.1-beta is out, unless something nasty creeps out it should be out quite soon.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Mona Chitnis <chit...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > I'd suggest OOZIE-1448, 1513 and 1530 bug fixes go into 4.0.1 since they > contribute towards stability > > On 9/20/13 4:22 PM, "Robert Kanter" <rkan...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > >Thanks Rohini. I just put OOZIE-1284 into branch-4.0 and trunk. > > > >I also created OOZIE-1551 > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1551>to change the > >hadoop-2 profile to use 2.1.0-beta. Is there anything else > >we want to put in 4.0.1 besides these 3 things? > > > > > >thanks > >- Robert > > > > > >On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Rohini Palaniswamy > ><rohini.adi...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> Thanks Robert. Created 4.0.1 branch. OOZIE-1549 is checked in as part of > >> 4.0.1 in branch-4.0. Please go ahead and check in OOZIE-1284 in > >>branch-4.0. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Rohini > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Robert Kanter <rkan...@cloudera.com > >> >wrote: > >> > >> > I guess we need to update the release-log.txt to have a 4.0.1 section > >>in > >> > trunk and branch-4.0, but I don't think we need to do anything else. > >> > > >> > And for 4.0.1, according to > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOZIE/How+To+Release, we > >> just > >> > keep using branch-4.0 so no need to create a new branch either. > >> > > >> > Also, I think we should put > >> > OOZIE-1284<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1284 > >> > >(oozie.service.SchemaService.wf.ext.schemas > >> > in oozie-site is missing some > >> > newer xsd files) in 4.0.1. > >> > > >> > thanks > >> > - Robert > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Rohini Palaniswamy < > >> > rohini.adi...@gmail.com > >> > > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I will create a 4.0.1 version in jira for this. Is there anything > >> > > additional that needs to be done than adding the version in Versions > >> tab? > >> > > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Rohini > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Robert Kanter > >><rkan...@cloudera.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > That's a good idea; we can replace the unreleased 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT > >>with > >> > > > 2.1.0-beta for the "hadoop-2" profile. Is there anything else > >>that > >> > would > >> > > > be good (probably only critical or very minor things) to include > >>in > >> > this > >> > > > release? > >> > > > > >> > > > thanks > >> > > > - Robert > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur < > >> t...@cloudera.com > >> > > > >wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I think we should do a new Oozie release using Hadoop > >>2.1.0-beta, > >> > this > >> > > > will > >> > > > > help users and developers to start playing with Hadoop 2 . > >> > > > > > >> > > > > thx. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > Alejandro > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > -- Alejandro
