[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13785543#comment-13785543
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-1560:
----------------------------------

Testing JIRA OOZIE-1560

Cleaning local svn workspace

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 
132
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 4 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT 
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc 
warnings
{color:green}+1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} HEAD compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} patch compiles
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac 
warnings
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA 
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 1334
.    Tests failed: 1
.    Tests errors: 0

.    The patch failed the following testcases:

.      testGetServerUrls(org.apache.oozie.service.TestJobsConcurrencyService)

{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 

----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}


The full output of the test-patch run is available at

.   https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/817/

> Log messages should have a way of identifying which server they came from 
> when using HA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1560
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1560
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HA
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>         Attachments: OOZIE-1560.patch
>
>
> When using HA, the only way to know which server is processing a specific job 
> is to go into each server's log file and look for log messages about that 
> job; when looking at the logs from the API, there is no way to know.  
> This information can be useful, so it would be good to add the server name as 
> part of the log message.  This can either be done for logs permanently or can 
> be done when a server is aggregating/collating logs from the other servers.  
> The former is probably more efficient than the latter.  If we go with the 
> former, I'd say that we should always do it, regardless of HA so the log 
> formatting is consistent and in case that server is added to an HA group 
> later.
> For example, instead of this:
> {noformat}
> 2013-09-29 16:46:20,182 WARN org.apache.oozie.command.wf.ActionStartXCommand: 
> USER[root] GROUP[-] TOKEN[] APP[demo-wf] 
> JOB[0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W] 
> ACTION[0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W@streaming-node] 
> [***0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W@streaming-node***]Action 
> status=RUNNING
> {noformat}
> we can have this:
> {noformat}
> 2013-09-29 16:46:20,182 WARN org.apache.oozie.command.wf.ActionStartXCommand: 
> USER[root] GROUP[-] SERVER[oozieA] TOKEN[] APP[demo-wf] 
> JOB[0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W] 
> ACTION[0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W@streaming-node] 
> [***0000000-130925230553293-oozie-oozi-W@streaming-node***]Action 
> status=RUNNING
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to