[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1676?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13887261#comment-13887261
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1676:
--------------------------------------
It can be if we have Oozie remember any Oozie servers it sees; instead of just
looking at what ZK is reporting, which is only the currently active ones. Or
something like OOZIE-1564 (though we might not do OOZIE-1564 if we can do
OOZIE-1561 instead).
> Instrumentation and Configuration over the REST API and Web UI should include
> all Oozie servers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-1676
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1676
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: HA
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Robert Kanter
> Priority: Minor
>
> This isn't that important, but it would be good if we updated the REST API
> and Web UI to return the instrumentation and configuration for each Oozie
> server when HA is being used. As it stands, each time you refresh the page
> (and are going through the load balancer), you'll get the
> instrumentation/configuration for a different server, which are not identical
> and there isn't really a way to tell which server they came from. This
> should be a new version of the REST API (v3) because it would change the
> return format to be an array of servers with their
> instrumentation/configuration info.
> The backend of this would have the contacted Oozie server simply ask each of
> the other Oozie servers for their instrumentation or configuration and
> combine them all (with the name of each server) into the response.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
