[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13899678#comment-13899678
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-426:
-------------------------------------
That's already been done. I haven't tried s3 before, but I have gotten a
workflow to run from the local filesystem (i.e.
{{file:///path/to/workflow.xml}}). So, while not regularly tested, you should
be able to use any filesystem type as long as Hadoop has a {{FileSystem}}
implementation for it (IIRC, s3 has one so it should work too).
> OOZIE-9: Support (Amazon) s3/s3n schemes
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-426
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Hadoop QA
> Assignee: Roman Shaposhnik
>
> Currently Oozie supports only the 'hdfs' scheme. For people having their
> hadoop cluster in Amazon EC2 and using S3 for storage, it would be very
> useful if oozie supports the 's3n/s3' scheme(s). The use case I am talking
> about is as follows
> Hadoop cluster in Amazon EC2
> Uses hdfs for intermediate storage
> Uses s3 for getting input for, storing output of map-reduce jobs.
> More details on the above use-case and the exceptions/failures I have seen is
> documented here (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Oozie-users/message/1138).
> There can be other use cases as well - say use s3 as the DFS instead of HDFS.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
