[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13944402#comment-13944402
]
Benjamin Zhitomirsky commented on OOZIE-1685:
---------------------------------------------
I am uploading the same patch 3rd time, and it always fails with different
errors. Does anybody know how to overcome it? The last test case name was not
reported, but I locked up in the logs, so it is
org.apache.oozie.event.TestEventGeneration/testCoordinatorActionEvent. The
previous test-patch had another test failed.
> Oozie doesn’t process correctly workflows with a non-default name node
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-1685
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1685
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: trunk, 3.3.2, 4.0.0
> Environment: Any
> Reporter: Benjamin Zhitomirsky
> Fix For: trunk
>
> Attachments: Design of the fix OOZIE-1685-rev1.docx,
> oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch, oozie-1685-trunk.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 168h
> Remaining Estimate: 168h
>
> When <name-node> element in Oozie workflow specifies a name node different
> from the default one (specified in core-site.xml), the following
> functionality doesn’t work properly:
> - Location of libraries specified via
> oozie.service.WorkflowAppService.system.libpath. Oozie first (during launcher
> configuration) tries to locate them using name node specified by the
> <name-node> element, but later during job submission it expects this path to
> be under the default Oozie name node
> - Processing of the job-xml element if job xml is specified via absolute
> path. Oozie tries locate it under the default Oozie name node instead of the
> name-node specified in action.
> Specifying non-default name node makes a lot of sense in Azure environment,
> because it allows to submit the same job to different Hadoop clusters.
> I will submit a fix for CR soon. Please refer attached short document for
> more information.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
