[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14011426#comment-14011426
]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-1319:
--------------------------------------
{quote}Can you change the check for "LAST_ONLY" execution order to
"ignoreCase"?{quote}
When checking LAST_ONLY I use the enum, not the String, so that shouldn't be a
problem. Unless I did one of the checks the wrong way?
I don't think we should merge OOZIE-1305 into this JIRA; this patch is big and
complicated enough. But it definitely makes sense to re-use the SKIPPED status
I added for the NONE execution order. Agree?
> "LAST_ONLY" in execution control for coordinator job still runs all the
> actions
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-1319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1319
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Bowen Zhang
> Assignee: Robert Kanter
> Attachments: OOZIE-1319.patch, OOZIE-1319.patch, OOZIE-1319.patch,
> OOZIE-1319.patch, OOZIE-1319.patch, oozie-1319.patch
>
>
> In execute() of CoordJobGetReadyActionsJPAExecutor.java, once we retrieve the
> top item from a "LIFO" query result, we do not discard or delete the
> remaining items from the result list. As a result, the next time execute() is
> invoked, we will be retrieving the next item in line. Consequently, LAST_ONLY
> strategy will also execute all ready actions for a given coordinator job,
> making it no different than LIFO.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
