[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14055410#comment-14055410
 ] 

Purshotam Shah commented on OOZIE-1916:
---------------------------------------

+1 for approach, will simplify things.
Looks good. 
Minor comment.
{code}
+        if (leaderLatch != null) {
+            IOUtils.closeSafely(leaderLatch);
+        }
{code}
You can use Curator's CloseableUtils 
(https://curator.apache.org/apidocs/org/apache/curator/utils/CloseableUtils.html)
 to close Closeable.

In future if they need to do housekeeping before closing, it can be done 
without any change.

> Use Curator leader latch instead of checking the order of Oozie servers
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-1916
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1916
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HA
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: OOZIE-1916.patch
>
>
> We currently have a few tasks (e.g. Purging old jobs) that we only want to do 
> in one Oozie server.  We currently simply check which Oozie server is first 
> in ZooKeeper's list of servers (i.e. the order they connected).  We haven't 
> seen any problems with this, but it might be a good idea to replace this with 
> Curator's leader-latch, which sounds more robust.  
> The leader path should probably be something like "/services/leader".
> Make sure errors and edge cases are handled properly, including what happens 
> when the leader dies without unregistering, etc.
> http://curator.apache.org/curator-recipes/leader-latch.html



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to