[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14307284#comment-14307284
]
Ben Roling commented on OOZIE-2060:
-----------------------------------
Hmm, the EL function route sounds sort of interesting. It seems like that
should be do-able. Unfortunately I'm not sure I am going to get much time to
play around with that soon. If you want to go forward with a change with
{{-conf action.xml}} and a note that the filename could be subject to change
that is fine by me. I welcome you to make whatever changes you like to my
patch and move forward without waiting for me.
> Incorrect documentation of Java action config XML filename
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2060
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2060
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.3.2, 4.0.0, 4.0.1
> Reporter: Ben Roling
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OOZIE-2060.patch, OOZIE-2060.patch
>
>
> The [documentation of Java
> action|https://oozie.apache.org/docs/4.0.1/WorkflowFunctionalSpec.html#a3.2.7_Java_Action]
> suggests that Java action configuration is available in a file named
> "oozie-action.conf.xml".
> This does not seem to me to be true. My experience is that this
> configuration is available in "action.xml".
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
