Ryota, is this the only issue from regression?

Dev team, does anyone want to take up OOZIE-1993?

Regards,
Shwetha


On 10/04/15 12:38 am, "Ryota Egashira" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>OOZIE-1993 need to be fixed before release.workflow rerun failed with
>oozie.wf.rerun.failnodes=true in some cases. actually because of this, we
>reverted OOZIE-1879 for our internal branch.
>
>ThanksRyota 
>
>
>
>     On Thursday, March 26, 2015 4:57 PM, Robert Kanter
><[email protected]> wrote:
>   
>
> Another JIRA that would be good to get is OOZIE-2186 which updates the
>Tomcat version.
>
>On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Shwetha Shivalingamurthy <
>[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I will wait for them. Thanks
>>
>>
>> On 26/03/15 2:21 pm, "Rohini Palaniswamy" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>>
>> >We don't have a list of issues that need to be included. But Michelle
>>ran
>> >the regression with trunk yesterday and there were couple of failures.
>>We
>> >haven't investigated them yet. Those will have to be fixed though.
>>Ryota
>> >will file jiras and upload fixes next week after investigating them.
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Rohini
>> >
>> >On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I can take over OOZIE-1963. I need to test the modified hive(1)
>>example
>> >>and
>> >> will then attach the change to the JIRA.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Robert Kanter <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I was hoping one of our QA engineers would take care of that, but
>>it
>> >> looks
>> >> > like he won't have time.  I don't think I'm proficient enough in
>>Hive
>> >> > Server 2 to make the example, so I've unassigned OOZIE-1963 from
>>me.
>> >> > Though I think it would still be good to include.
>> >> >
>> >> > If we include the Spark action, I think we should also include
>> >> OOZIE-2170.
>> >> > OOZIE-2174 would also be good; it addresses some long-standing
>> >> shortcomings
>> >> > of OozieClient/OozieCLI.
>> >> > Finally, we should also include OOZIE-2181, which fixes some
>>problems
>> >> > retrieving job info.
>> >> > I have patches available for all 3 of these.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > - Robert
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Shwetha Shivalingamurthy <
>> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Robert, will you be able to take up OOZIE-1963?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Dev team, Are there any other un-resolved jiras that needs to be
>> >>part
>> >> of
>> >> > > 4.2 release?
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Shwetha
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On 11/02/15 1:44 pm, "Robert Kanter" <[email protected]>
>>wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >I 4.2.0 release sounds good; I don't have cycles to drive it
>> >>though.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >The Spark action currently has a number of problems with it.
>>I'd
>> >>hold
>> >> > off
>> >> > > >on putting that into a release until we get those fixed
>>(OOZIE-2071
>> >> > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2071> (it's to add
>>an
>> >> > > >example,
>> >> > > >but the comments discuss the problems), OOZIE-2087
>> >> > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2087>).
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >I'm all for including the Hive2 action; though it would be good
>>if
>> >>we
>> >> > > >could
>> >> > > >create an example workflow for it for completeness (OOZIE-1963
>> >> > > ><https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1963>).  I can
>> >>probably
>> >> > take
>> >> > > >care of this relatively easily.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >- Robert
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Shwetha Shivalingamurthy <
>> >> > > >[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >> Hi All,
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Oozie trunk has a couple of changes since the last oozie
>>release
>> >>-
>> >> > > >>re-run
>> >> > > >> fixes, config cleanup, spark action, hive2 action, external
>> >> > > >>configuration
>> >> > > >> for mapred action, better error reporting and many other bug
>> >>fixes.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Can we have a oozie release from trunk? If someone wants to
>> >> volunteer
>> >> > to
>> >> > > >> drive the release, please take this forward. Else, I can drive
>> >>it as
>> >> > > >>well.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> If we want to do a release, let's identify the pending jiras
>> >>which
>> >> are
>> >> > > >> required for this release.
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > > >> Thanks,
>> >> > > >> Shwetha
>> >> > > >>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Harsh J
>> >>
>>
>>
>
>
>  

Reply via email to