[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Shwetha G S updated OOZIE-2014:
-------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: trunk)
                   4.2

> TestAuthFilterAuthOozieClient fails after OOZIE-1917
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2014
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2014
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tests
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>             Fix For: 4.2
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-2014.patch
>
>
> As part of OOZIE-1917, we removed the 
> {{oozie.authentication.signature.secret}} property so it will default to a 
> randomly generated secret instead of "oozie" as the secret.  This causes 
> {{TestAuthFilterAuthOozieClient.testClientAuthTokenCache}} to fail because 
> it's comparing the auth token from two calls to two different Oozie server 
> instances, which now don't match because the secret is different.
> {noformat}
> testClientAuthTokenCache(org.apache.oozie.servlet.TestAuthFilterAuthOozieClient)
>   Time elapsed: 0.008 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: 
> expected:<...=simple&e=1411181460[262&s=ih179o8nT7c1pRorbFhE17QKemQ]=> but 
> was:<...=simple&e=1411181460[645&s=mh9optNIM2eTqJsrXT7rcJjeTiI]=>
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:85)
>       at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:91)
>       at 
> org.apache.oozie.servlet.TestAuthFilterAuthOozieClient.testClientAuthTokenCache(TestAuthFilterAuthOozieClient.java:193)
>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>       at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>       at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
>       at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
>       at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
>       at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
>       at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
>       at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
>       at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
>       at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
>       at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
>       at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
>       at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
>       at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>       at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>       at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to