[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15220498#comment-15220498
 ] 

Rohini Palaniswamy commented on OOZIE-2486:
-------------------------------------------

+1

> TestSLAEventsGetForFilterJPAExecutor is flakey
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2486
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2486
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tests
>    Affects Versions: trunk
>            Reporter: Robert Kanter
>            Assignee: Robert Kanter
>             Fix For: trunk
>
>         Attachments: OOZIE-2486.001.patch
>
>
> The test method that fails varies from different runs, but you'll see 
> something like this:
> {noformat}
> testGetSLAEventsForOR(org.apache.oozie.executor.jpa.TestSLAEventsGetForFilterJPAExecutor)
>   Time elapsed: 0.013 sec  <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<4> but was:<3>
>         at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
>         at junit.framework.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:287)
>         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:67)
>         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:199)
>         at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:205)
>         at 
> org.apache.oozie.executor.jpa.TestSLAEventsGetForFilterJPAExecutor.testGetSLAEventsForOR(TestSLAEventsGetForFilterJPAExecutor.java:127)
>         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
>         at 
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:168)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:134)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
>         at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
>         at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:124)
>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
>         at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
>         at 
> org.junit.internal.runners.JUnit38ClassRunner.run(JUnit38ClassRunner.java:83)
>         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:128)
>         at org.junit.runners.Suite.runChild(Suite.java:24)
>         at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>         at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>         at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
> You also see this if you run some of the test methods individually.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to