[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397007#comment-15397007
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-2534:
----------------------------------

Testing JIRA OOZIE-2534

Cleaning local git workspace

----------------------------

{color:green}+1 PATCH_APPLIES{color}
{color:green}+1 CLEAN{color}
{color:green}+1 RAW_PATCH_ANALYSIS{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any @author tags
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any tabs
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any trailing spaces
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not introduce any line longer than 
132
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does adds/modifies 1 testcase(s)
{color:green}+1 RAT{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new RAT 
warnings
{color:green}+1 JAVADOC{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new Javadoc 
warnings
{color:red}-1 COMPILE{color}
.    {color:red}-1{color} HEAD does not compile
.    {color:red}-1{color} patch does not compile
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not seem to introduce new javac 
warnings
{color:green}+1 BACKWARDS_COMPATIBILITY{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not change any JPA 
Entity/Colum/Basic/Lob/Transient annotations
.    {color:green}+1{color} the patch does not modify JPA files
{color:red}-1 TESTS{color}
.    Tests run: 1791
.    Tests failed: 1
.    Tests errors: 0

.    The patch failed the following testcases:

.      
testNone(org.apache.oozie.command.coord.TestCoordActionInputCheckXCommandNonUTC)

{color:green}+1 DISTRO{color}
.    {color:green}+1{color} distro tarball builds with the patch 

----------------------------
{color:red}*-1 Overall result, please check the reported -1(s)*{color}


The full output of the test-patch run is available at

.   https://builds.apache.org/job/oozie-trunk-precommit-build/3115/

> Versioned action libs (similar to how SharedLibs works)
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-2534
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2534
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0
>            Reporter: Evgenij Kozhevnikov
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: versionedActionLibs.diff
>
>
> Case #1:
> Some projects uses lib folder near the workflow.xml in HDFS to put 
> dependencies for the particular module. This jars often contains the version 
> in name (example, some-internal-lib-1.2.3.jar). Before update the project you 
> have to make sure that there are no RUNNING instances of the workflow, 
> otherwise you risk to get an exception "JA008: File does not exist".
> Case #2:
> There are can be run some separate coordinators in Oozie with common sources 
> in HDFS (with different properties). Some projects I've seen have more than 
> 30 coordinators with common sources in HDFS. Some of them works daily, some 
> hourly and another every 10 minutes. And even more these workflows can be 
> called as subworkflows from another sources. It is very difficult to manage 
> all this projects during updates. You have to suspend all dependees, make 
> sure there are no any running instances and anyway you have to stop your 
> cluster activities on this period, so after all the load on the cluster will 
> increase.
> Solution:
> I suggest to have the same mechanism as sharedLibs, but for action libs. If 
> actionLib contains any jars in the root they will be put on classpath as it 
> were before. So the change will be backward compatible. But at the same time 
> you can create a subdirectory with prefiix "lib_" and some timestamp or 
> incremental version after that. JavaActionExecutor will take only the latest 
> version subdirectory and put all artifacts from it to job cache.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to