[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901172#comment-15901172
]
Harsh J commented on OOZIE-807:
-------------------------------
This one-liner doc patch should still apply. Reviews, anyone? [~rkanter] or
[~rohini]?
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow
> multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc
> page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is
> possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
