> On March 30, 2017, 1:39 a.m., Robert Kanter wrote:
> > core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/TimestampedMessageParser.java
> > Lines 194-214 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/43970/diff/5/?file=1650584#file1650584line195>
> >
> >     This code is almost identical to the code above.  Is there any way to 
> > combine them?  Otherwise, it can be easy for these to diverge accidently in 
> > the future.

Actually, see my other comment about parseNextLine not being needed anymore.  
In that case, there's no duplication.


- Robert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/43970/#review170509
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 27, 2017, 7:42 p.m., Satish Saley wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/43970/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 27, 2017, 7:42 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2417
>     
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2417
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch tries to minimize the parsing of same log line for multiple times 
> using different regex.
> It also caches the log parts once we figure out what those are, thus avoiding 
> the re-parsing of log line to get log parts whenever needed.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/LogLine.java PRE-CREATION 
>   
> core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/SimpleTimestampedMessageParser.java 
> 78cb042 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/TimestampedMessageParser.java 
> a676f4d 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/util/XLogFilter.java 3b49f77 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43970/diff/5/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Satish Saley
> 
>

Reply via email to