-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#review171691
-----------------------------------------------------------




core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/CoordChangeXCommand.java
Lines 439-442 (original), 439-442 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244707>

    Would be nice to have a `TRACE` log both in the `if` and in the `else` 
branch.



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Lines 62 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244713>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(1)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 541 (original), 542 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244720>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(4)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 627 (original), 628 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244721>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(3)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 732 (original), 733 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244722>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(2)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 766 (original), 767 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244723>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(5)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 811 (original), 812 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244724>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(5)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 840 (original), 841 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244725>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(5)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 869 (original), 870 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244726>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(4)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Line 889 (original), 890 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244727>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(4)`?



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Lines 909 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244728>

    Please rename to a test method name that expresses both the prerequisites 
and the expected end state of the test case, like 
`testWhenJobIsKilledNoActionIsCreated()`.



core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
Lines 911-912 (patched)
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/#comment244729>

    Why not use `java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.HOURS.toMillis(4)`?


- András Piros


On April 11, 2017, 6:58 p.m., Purshotam Shah wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 11, 2017, 6:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Bugs: OOZIE-2862
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2862
> 
> 
> Repository: oozie-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Coord change command doesn't change job to running if job was killed without 
> creating any actions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   core/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/CoordChangeXCommand.java 
> e65b74fc 
>   
> core/src/test/java/org/apache/oozie/command/coord/TestCoordChangeXCommand.java
>  8034bbe9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/58365/diff/1/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Purshotam Shah
> 
>

Reply via email to