[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2876?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16029300#comment-16029300
]
Peter Cseh commented on OOZIE-2876:
-----------------------------------
I don't quite understand why having a git and maven action is beneficial in a
production environment. I can see how it can speed up development (having WFs
in a git repo and a worklflow is pulling the changes in), but I don't think
that justifies adding two new action types.
[~clayb], can you provide us some more detailed use cases that you're thinking
about?
> Provide deployment primitives
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2876
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2876
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: action
> Reporter: Clay B.
> Priority: Minor
>
> Today one can schedule workflows which run on a cluster using many
> pre-existing artifacts. However, today there are no helpful primitives for
> deploying those artifacts to the cluster.
> For example, one may use a Spark JAR (hosted in a Maven repository) stored on
> a cluster's HDFS to talk with data stored in a Hive table (the schema of
> which is likely tracked in a source code management system somewhere) and use
> JDBC to talk to an arbitrary database off the cluster. (As to which database
> being configured based on the cluster being Dev, Beta or PROD all mapped in a
> simple configuration file.) Further, the data may be verified by a simple Pig
> script (also stored in a source code management repository).
> As a user, I'd like some way to get my binaries and ASCII configuration on a
> cluster without significant ad hoc shell actions.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
